TALA888 GCash Filipinas-Where can I watch Champions League Philippines 2022? - Philippines

EXPERTS have recommended the transfer of the management of the Cebu Bus Rapid Transit (CBRT) project from the Department of Transportation to the Cebu City Government saying the success of the project lies in a “competent” project management. “Let it be done by the City, by Cebu City. They are the proponents of it. Do it yourself,” said Rene Santiago, an engineer and mass transportation expert and consultant, in an interview after an executive session about the CBRT project on Wednesday, April 3, 2024.Biggest mishap of BRT?Santiago recalled telling the World Bank in 2014 that the BRT would fail, attributing 50 percent of the issue to implementation and the other 50 percent to technical aspects.Santiago said CBRT could not be an exclusive route if it passes on Escario St., given the narrowness of the main thoroughfare. He emphasized that the plan was for Osmeña Blvd., where it can become an exclusive route due to the wider lane.“I don’t see how you can make it exclusive, that section to go to Cebu IT Park. Of course, when I look at Mango Ave. it’s wider, maybe it can be exclusive,” Santiago said.Meanwhile, Nigel Paul Villarete, an engineer and an urban planner and one of the first supporters of BRT as Cebu City’s base urban transportation system since 2008, said that “everything went wrong.” However, he said he still supports the CBRT project as a mode of mass transportation.“So many things have gone wrong, so many things have gone astray and it’s very difficult for me to look back and say what’s that thing that is the (hardest) the most? It is cumulative. It’s so hard to correct now. But it is still a good project. Let’s hope for this first line. I am also hoping for the Bulacao to Ayala,” he added. CBRT’s first package covers a distance of 2.38 kilometers from the Cebu South Bus Terminal along N. Bacalso Ave. to the front of the Capitol building along Osmeña Blvd. Package 2 of the CBRT involves the south trunk; from the South Road Properties to Barangay Mambaling via N. Bacalso Ave., while Package 3 refers to the CBRT’s north trunk: from Capitol to North Escario to Gorordo Ave. to Archbishop Reyes Ave. to Cebu IT Park.Meanwhile, Santiago sees the BRT project in conflict with the current implementation of the PUV (public utility vehicle) modernization since the same franchises were given to operators along the same route.Three optionsSantiago said there could be three options for the CBRT project to move forward — to continue (building it) unhampered, change its management or terminate it.“We have three choices for BRT: continue business as usual, let it continue unhampered. You will probably get a product in 2028, if the DOTr will be as good as it should be. But that would be a poor probability of happening based on the record for the past 10 years, it has not shown a competent project team,” Santiago said.He said the political grumbling in Cebu led to the City considering Solomonic solutions, with two options.He said the first option could be the proposal of Councilor James Anthony Cuenco, chairman of the transportation committee, to make the CBRT Package 1 a pilot project before proceeding to the other two packages.“And if you do that, there is a 90 percent probability that it should be terminated because there will be traffic in that short section,” he said.The second option, on the other hand, which is a longer section, is to let the whole line be operational, which he said, can be done in six months.“Package 1 takes almost two years, and then Packages 2 and 3 are longer. They say it will be finished in 2027, but if you consider the experience of Package 1, it will probably take you to 2030,” Santiago said.But what will happen to the center islands? Santiago said he advocated for solutions like underpasses to improve pedestrian crossings in the BRT project, emphasizing their cost-effectiveness and convenience. However, he criticized the 15-minute overhead crosswalks as punitive, especially for senior citizens. Santiago insisted on accessibility for BRT stations, suggesting escalators or underpasses; however, he condemned the removal of skywalks without replacements, warning of worsened traffic conditions. He questioned the safety measures for buses and recalled the DPWH’s clearance of skywalks higher than bus heights during construction. / AML Where can I watch Champions League Philippines 2022? Philippines THE International Criminal Court (ICC) has “directly communicated” with over 50 active and former police officials in relation to its investigation on the alleged crime against humanity, or murder in the country during the drug war of former President Rodrigo Duterte.This was bared by former senator Antonio Trillanes IV, who said in a social media post Wednesday, April 24, 2024: “Based on highly credible information, the ICC investigators have already directly communicated with more than 50 active and former PNP officials regarding their being implicated in the crimes against humanity case of Rodrigo Duterte at the ICC.”“This means that if they do not immediately signify their intention to cooperate with the investigators, their status would be elevated to being suspects and, therefore, would result in travel restrictions initially and eventually arrest via Interpol,” he added.In response, Philippine National Police (PNP) chief of the Public Information Office (PIO) Colonel Jean Fajardo maintained that while they respect the ongoing investigation of the ICC, they stand by the position of the National Government.“We have working judicial system. Meron tayong mga korte na pupuwede pong duminig kung meron man pong mga pag-aabuso at mga ireguralidad sa hanay ng PNP at napatunayan natin dahil may mga pulis tayo na nakasuhan, nakulong at naconvict. So yun ang gagawin ng PNP, magpapasakop sa hurisdiksyon ng Pilipinas,” she said.(We have a working judicial system. We have courts that can hear if there are any abuses and irregularities in the ranks of the PNP and we have proven it because we have police officers who have been charged, imprisoned and convicted. So that's what the PNP will do, submit to the jurisdiction of the Philippines.)Trillanes was among the personalities who sought for the intervention of the ICC into the bloody drug war of Duterte back in 2017.He earlier said that the ICC have gathered enough evidence against Duterte and an arrest warrant against him may be out “very very soon.”President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. earlier maintained that the Philippines will not cooperate in the ongoing ICC probe into Duterte’s drug war, as the ICC has no jurisdiction over the country.Marcos said he considered the ICC as a threat to the country’s sovereignty.He said the Philippines will not recognize any arrest warrant that may be issued by the ICC."We don't recognize the warrant that they will send to us...That's a no…We are well within international law when we take the position of not recognizing the jurisdiction of ICC in the Philippines," said Marcos.In July 2023, the ICC appeals chamber has granted a request seeking the resumption of investigation on alleged crime against humanity or murder in the Philippines related to the controversial drug war of Duterte from November 1, 2011 to March 16, 2019.Duterte was the mayor of Davao City from 2011 before he was elected as the president of the Republic in 2016.The former President ordered the withdrawal of the Philippine’s membership to the Rome Statute, which established the ICC, in March 2019.Also named as principal respondent of the case along with Duterte was former chief of the PNP now Senator Ronald “Bato” dela Rosa.Dela Rosa served as the chief implementer of the drug war, which resulted in the death of over 6,000 alleged drug personalities.Several policemen were facing charges before the Department of Justice over alleged irregularities in the conduct of anti-illegal drugs operations under the former administration, including the alleged planting of evidence, among others. (TPM/SunStar Philippines)

THE International Criminal Court (ICC) has “directly communicated” with over 50 active and former police officials in relation to its investigation on the alleged crime against humanity, or murder in the country during the drug war of former President Rodrigo Duterte.This was bared by former senator Antonio Trillanes IV, who said in a social media post Wednesday, April 24, 2024: “Based on highly credible information, the ICC investigators have already directly communicated with more than 50 active and former PNP officials regarding their being implicated in the crimes against humanity case of Rodrigo Duterte at the ICC.”“This means that if they do not immediately signify their intention to cooperate with the investigators, their status would be elevated to being suspects and, therefore, would result in travel restrictions initially and eventually arrest via Interpol,” he added.In response, Philippine National Police (PNP) chief of the Public Information Office (PIO) Colonel Jean Fajardo maintained that while they respect the ongoing investigation of the ICC, they stand by the position of the National Government.“We have working judicial system. Meron tayong mga korte na pupuwede pong duminig kung meron man pong mga pag-aabuso at mga ireguralidad sa hanay ng PNP at napatunayan natin dahil may mga pulis tayo na nakasuhan, nakulong at naconvict. So yun ang gagawin ng PNP, magpapasakop sa hurisdiksyon ng Pilipinas,” she said.(We have a working judicial system. We have courts that can hear if there are any abuses and irregularities in the ranks of the PNP and we have proven it because we have police officers who have been charged, imprisoned and convicted. So that's what the PNP will do, submit to the jurisdiction of the Philippines.)Trillanes was among the personalities who sought for the intervention of the ICC into the bloody drug war of Duterte back in 2017.He earlier said that the ICC have gathered enough evidence against Duterte and an arrest warrant against him may be out “very very soon.”President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. earlier maintained that the Philippines will not cooperate in the ongoing ICC probe into Duterte’s drug war, as the ICC has no jurisdiction over the country.Marcos said he considered the ICC as a threat to the country’s sovereignty.He said the Philippines will not recognize any arrest warrant that may be issued by the ICC."We don't recognize the warrant that they will send to us...That's a no…We are well within international law when we take the position of not recognizing the jurisdiction of ICC in the Philippines," said Marcos.In July 2023, the ICC appeals chamber has granted a request seeking the resumption of investigation on alleged crime against humanity or murder in the Philippines related to the controversial drug war of Duterte from November 1, 2011 to March 16, 2019.Duterte was the mayor of Davao City from 2011 before he was elected as the president of the Republic in 2016.The former President ordered the withdrawal of the Philippine’s membership to the Rome Statute, which established the ICC, in March 2019.Also named as principal respondent of the case along with Duterte was former chief of the PNP now Senator Ronald “Bato” dela Rosa.Dela Rosa served as the chief implementer of the drug war, which resulted in the death of over 6,000 alleged drug personalities.Several policemen were facing charges before the Department of Justice over alleged irregularities in the conduct of anti-illegal drugs operations under the former administration, including the alleged planting of evidence, among others. (TPM/SunStar Philippines) Membership Card Benefits at Philippine Casinos THE Central Visayas Regional Police Office has ordered an investigation on possible criminal liability of individuals involved in the controversial online interview of Brigada News FM with a minor rape victim from Dumanjug, Cebu.In a statement, the Police Regional Office 7 clarified that the viral interview of the minor victim by Brigada News FM was conducted within the premises of their residence and not in the Dumanjug police station and also without the consent or knowledge of the police.It said the sexual abuse allegedly happened on March 8, 2024 and was reported to the police station on March 10, 2024. The police interviewed the victim on March 11, 2024 in the police station in the presence of the Municipal Social Worker and Development Officer (MSWDO), her mother and aunt, and the school teacher of the minor.It maintained that the interview was done in accord with the procedures in handling child victims, ensuring confidentiality of the proceedings.However, it said the minor’s aunt, without the knowledge and consent of the police officer and MSWDO, discreetly took a video during the interview and forwarded it to another person who posted it on social media. The video was later on deleted.In a separate statement, the Dumanjug Municipal Police Station (MPS) noted that the victim’s mother called up a media personality, whom she personally knew, to report the incident and ask for advice prior to reporting to the police station.On March 13, Juril Patiño, a lawyer, and Dennes Tabar, anchors of Brigada News FM Cebu, conducted a live on-air interview of the victim. It was facilitated by their field reporter, Jonalyn Jumabis.During the interview, the broadcasters asked the minor victim to recount the details of the abuse. “After the interview, the minor victim and her mother reported back to Dumanjug MPS to turn over the medical/psychological examination result and to further review the prepared documents for the filing of formal criminal complaints against the suspect,” the Dumanjug MPS said.“Upon knowing that the victim’s mother entertained a radio interview about the incident, the WCPD investigator again reminded the former to protect the confidential nature of the case and to refrain from entertaining anymore media interviews,” it added.The Dumanjug MPS recommended to the higher headquarters the filing of appropriate complaints, if evidence warrants, to the persons involved in the posting of the video and the conduct of interview in accordance with the Best Interest of the Child under Republic Act 7610. (TPM/SunStar Philippines)

Top PH Online Casinos Ranked

THE Central Visayas Regional Police Office has ordered an investigation on possible criminal liability of individuals involved in the controversial online interview of Brigada News FM with a minor rape victim from Dumanjug, Cebu.In a statement, the Police Regional Office 7 clarified that the viral interview of the minor victim by Brigada News FM was conducted within the premises of their residence and not in the Dumanjug police station and also without the consent or knowledge of the police.It said the sexual abuse allegedly happened on March 8, 2024 and was reported to the police station on March 10, 2024. The police interviewed the victim on March 11, 2024 in the police station in the presence of the Municipal Social Worker and Development Officer (MSWDO), her mother and aunt, and the school teacher of the minor.It maintained that the interview was done in accord with the procedures in handling child victims, ensuring confidentiality of the proceedings.However, it said the minor’s aunt, without the knowledge and consent of the police officer and MSWDO, discreetly took a video during the interview and forwarded it to another person who posted it on social media. The video was later on deleted.In a separate statement, the Dumanjug Municipal Police Station (MPS) noted that the victim’s mother called up a media personality, whom she personally knew, to report the incident and ask for advice prior to reporting to the police station.On March 13, Juril Patiño, a lawyer, and Dennes Tabar, anchors of Brigada News FM Cebu, conducted a live on-air interview of the victim. It was facilitated by their field reporter, Jonalyn Jumabis.During the interview, the broadcasters asked the minor victim to recount the details of the abuse. “After the interview, the minor victim and her mother reported back to Dumanjug MPS to turn over the medical/psychological examination result and to further review the prepared documents for the filing of formal criminal complaints against the suspect,” the Dumanjug MPS said.“Upon knowing that the victim’s mother entertained a radio interview about the incident, the WCPD investigator again reminded the former to protect the confidential nature of the case and to refrain from entertaining anymore media interviews,” it added.The Dumanjug MPS recommended to the higher headquarters the filing of appropriate complaints, if evidence warrants, to the persons involved in the posting of the video and the conduct of interview in accordance with the Best Interest of the Child under Republic Act 7610. (TPM/SunStar Philippines) Membership Card Benefits at Philippine Casinos EXPERTS have recommended the transfer of the management of the Cebu Bus Rapid Transit (CBRT) project from the Department of Transportation to the Cebu City Government saying the success of the project lies in a “competent” project management. “Let it be done by the City, by Cebu City. They are the proponents of it. Do it yourself,” said Rene Santiago, an engineer and mass transportation expert and consultant, in an interview after an executive session about the CBRT project on Wednesday, April 3, 2024.Biggest mishap of BRT?Santiago recalled telling the World Bank in 2014 that the BRT would fail, attributing 50 percent of the issue to implementation and the other 50 percent to technical aspects.Santiago said CBRT could not be an exclusive route if it passes on Escario St., given the narrowness of the main thoroughfare. He emphasized that the plan was for Osmeña Blvd., where it can become an exclusive route due to the wider lane.“I don’t see how you can make it exclusive, that section to go to Cebu IT Park. Of course, when I look at Mango Ave. it’s wider, maybe it can be exclusive,” Santiago said.Meanwhile, Nigel Paul Villarete, an engineer and an urban planner and one of the first supporters of BRT as Cebu City’s base urban transportation system since 2008, said that “everything went wrong.” However, he said he still supports the CBRT project as a mode of mass transportation.“So many things have gone wrong, so many things have gone astray and it’s very difficult for me to look back and say what’s that thing that is the (hardest) the most? It is cumulative. It’s so hard to correct now. But it is still a good project. Let’s hope for this first line. I am also hoping for the Bulacao to Ayala,” he added. CBRT’s first package covers a distance of 2.38 kilometers from the Cebu South Bus Terminal along N. Bacalso Ave. to the front of the Capitol building along Osmeña Blvd. Package 2 of the CBRT involves the south trunk; from the South Road Properties to Barangay Mambaling via N. Bacalso Ave., while Package 3 refers to the CBRT’s north trunk: from Capitol to North Escario to Gorordo Ave. to Archbishop Reyes Ave. to Cebu IT Park.Meanwhile, Santiago sees the BRT project in conflict with the current implementation of the PUV (public utility vehicle) modernization since the same franchises were given to operators along the same route.Three optionsSantiago said there could be three options for the CBRT project to move forward — to continue (building it) unhampered, change its management or terminate it.“We have three choices for BRT: continue business as usual, let it continue unhampered. You will probably get a product in 2028, if the DOTr will be as good as it should be. But that would be a poor probability of happening based on the record for the past 10 years, it has not shown a competent project team,” Santiago said.He said the political grumbling in Cebu led to the City considering Solomonic solutions, with two options.He said the first option could be the proposal of Councilor James Anthony Cuenco, chairman of the transportation committee, to make the CBRT Package 1 a pilot project before proceeding to the other two packages.“And if you do that, there is a 90 percent probability that it should be terminated because there will be traffic in that short section,” he said.The second option, on the other hand, which is a longer section, is to let the whole line be operational, which he said, can be done in six months.“Package 1 takes almost two years, and then Packages 2 and 3 are longer. They say it will be finished in 2027, but if you consider the experience of Package 1, it will probably take you to 2030,” Santiago said.But what will happen to the center islands? Santiago said he advocated for solutions like underpasses to improve pedestrian crossings in the BRT project, emphasizing their cost-effectiveness and convenience. However, he criticized the 15-minute overhead crosswalks as punitive, especially for senior citizens. Santiago insisted on accessibility for BRT stations, suggesting escalators or underpasses; however, he condemned the removal of skywalks without replacements, warning of worsened traffic conditions. He questioned the safety measures for buses and recalled the DPWH’s clearance of skywalks higher than bus heights during construction. / AML

Top Online Casinos in the Philippines for 2023

• 🥇 20Bet (Top-Rated Payment Methods Selection)
• 🥈 ICE Casino (Best-Rated Slots Game Library)
• 🥉 22BET (Best Casino for Real Money in the Philippines)
• ⭐ King Billy (Top for Live Dealer Table Games)
• ⭐ Wazamba (Excellent Safety and Security)

EXPERTS have recommended the transfer of the management of the Cebu Bus Rapid Transit (CBRT) project from the Department of Transportation to the Cebu City Government saying the success of the project lies in a “competent” project management. “Let it be done by the City, by Cebu City. They are the proponents of it. Do it yourself,” said Rene Santiago, an engineer and mass transportation expert and consultant, in an interview after an executive session about the CBRT project on Wednesday, April 3, 2024.Biggest mishap of BRT?Santiago recalled telling the World Bank in 2014 that the BRT would fail, attributing 50 percent of the issue to implementation and the other 50 percent to technical aspects.Santiago said CBRT could not be an exclusive route if it passes on Escario St., given the narrowness of the main thoroughfare. He emphasized that the plan was for Osmeña Blvd., where it can become an exclusive route due to the wider lane.“I don’t see how you can make it exclusive, that section to go to Cebu IT Park. Of course, when I look at Mango Ave. it’s wider, maybe it can be exclusive,” Santiago said.Meanwhile, Nigel Paul Villarete, an engineer and an urban planner and one of the first supporters of BRT as Cebu City’s base urban transportation system since 2008, said that “everything went wrong.” However, he said he still supports the CBRT project as a mode of mass transportation.“So many things have gone wrong, so many things have gone astray and it’s very difficult for me to look back and say what’s that thing that is the (hardest) the most? It is cumulative. It’s so hard to correct now. But it is still a good project. Let’s hope for this first line. I am also hoping for the Bulacao to Ayala,” he added. CBRT’s first package covers a distance of 2.38 kilometers from the Cebu South Bus Terminal along N. Bacalso Ave. to the front of the Capitol building along Osmeña Blvd. Package 2 of the CBRT involves the south trunk; from the South Road Properties to Barangay Mambaling via N. Bacalso Ave., while Package 3 refers to the CBRT’s north trunk: from Capitol to North Escario to Gorordo Ave. to Archbishop Reyes Ave. to Cebu IT Park.Meanwhile, Santiago sees the BRT project in conflict with the current implementation of the PUV (public utility vehicle) modernization since the same franchises were given to operators along the same route.Three optionsSantiago said there could be three options for the CBRT project to move forward — to continue (building it) unhampered, change its management or terminate it.“We have three choices for BRT: continue business as usual, let it continue unhampered. You will probably get a product in 2028, if the DOTr will be as good as it should be. But that would be a poor probability of happening based on the record for the past 10 years, it has not shown a competent project team,” Santiago said.He said the political grumbling in Cebu led to the City considering Solomonic solutions, with two options.He said the first option could be the proposal of Councilor James Anthony Cuenco, chairman of the transportation committee, to make the CBRT Package 1 a pilot project before proceeding to the other two packages.“And if you do that, there is a 90 percent probability that it should be terminated because there will be traffic in that short section,” he said.The second option, on the other hand, which is a longer section, is to let the whole line be operational, which he said, can be done in six months.“Package 1 takes almost two years, and then Packages 2 and 3 are longer. They say it will be finished in 2027, but if you consider the experience of Package 1, it will probably take you to 2030,” Santiago said.But what will happen to the center islands? Santiago said he advocated for solutions like underpasses to improve pedestrian crossings in the BRT project, emphasizing their cost-effectiveness and convenience. However, he criticized the 15-minute overhead crosswalks as punitive, especially for senior citizens. Santiago insisted on accessibility for BRT stations, suggesting escalators or underpasses; however, he condemned the removal of skywalks without replacements, warning of worsened traffic conditions. He questioned the safety measures for buses and recalled the DPWH’s clearance of skywalks higher than bus heights during construction. / AML, check the following table to see what categories most online casinos in the Philippines fit in.

THE International Criminal Court (ICC) has “directly communicated” with over 50 active and former police officials in relation to its investigation on the alleged crime against humanity, or murder in the country during the drug war of former President Rodrigo Duterte.This was bared by former senator Antonio Trillanes IV, who said in a social media post Wednesday, April 24, 2024: “Based on highly credible information, the ICC investigators have already directly communicated with more than 50 active and former PNP officials regarding their being implicated in the crimes against humanity case of Rodrigo Duterte at the ICC.”“This means that if they do not immediately signify their intention to cooperate with the investigators, their status would be elevated to being suspects and, therefore, would result in travel restrictions initially and eventually arrest via Interpol,” he added.In response, Philippine National Police (PNP) chief of the Public Information Office (PIO) Colonel Jean Fajardo maintained that while they respect the ongoing investigation of the ICC, they stand by the position of the National Government.“We have working judicial system. Meron tayong mga korte na pupuwede pong duminig kung meron man pong mga pag-aabuso at mga ireguralidad sa hanay ng PNP at napatunayan natin dahil may mga pulis tayo na nakasuhan, nakulong at naconvict. So yun ang gagawin ng PNP, magpapasakop sa hurisdiksyon ng Pilipinas,” she said.(We have a working judicial system. We have courts that can hear if there are any abuses and irregularities in the ranks of the PNP and we have proven it because we have police officers who have been charged, imprisoned and convicted. So that's what the PNP will do, submit to the jurisdiction of the Philippines.)Trillanes was among the personalities who sought for the intervention of the ICC into the bloody drug war of Duterte back in 2017.He earlier said that the ICC have gathered enough evidence against Duterte and an arrest warrant against him may be out “very very soon.”President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. earlier maintained that the Philippines will not cooperate in the ongoing ICC probe into Duterte’s drug war, as the ICC has no jurisdiction over the country.Marcos said he considered the ICC as a threat to the country’s sovereignty.He said the Philippines will not recognize any arrest warrant that may be issued by the ICC."We don't recognize the warrant that they will send to us...That's a no…We are well within international law when we take the position of not recognizing the jurisdiction of ICC in the Philippines," said Marcos.In July 2023, the ICC appeals chamber has granted a request seeking the resumption of investigation on alleged crime against humanity or murder in the Philippines related to the controversial drug war of Duterte from November 1, 2011 to March 16, 2019.Duterte was the mayor of Davao City from 2011 before he was elected as the president of the Republic in 2016.The former President ordered the withdrawal of the Philippine’s membership to the Rome Statute, which established the ICC, in March 2019.Also named as principal respondent of the case along with Duterte was former chief of the PNP now Senator Ronald “Bato” dela Rosa.Dela Rosa served as the chief implementer of the drug war, which resulted in the death of over 6,000 alleged drug personalities.Several policemen were facing charges before the Department of Justice over alleged irregularities in the conduct of anti-illegal drugs operations under the former administration, including the alleged planting of evidence, among others. (TPM/SunStar Philippines) Where can I watch Champions League Philippines 2022? . The Best TALA888 GCash Filipinas for Real Money ▷ Poker Online Philippines ▷ Fishing Game Play at the Top Real Money Casino, Win Real Money. here is how to register at an online casino site in the Philippines:

EXPERTS have recommended the transfer of the management of the Cebu Bus Rapid Transit (CBRT) project from the Department of Transportation to the Cebu City Government saying the success of the project lies in a “competent” project management. “Let it be done by the City, by Cebu City. They are the proponents of it. Do it yourself,” said Rene Santiago, an engineer and mass transportation expert and consultant, in an interview after an executive session about the CBRT project on Wednesday, April 3, 2024.Biggest mishap of BRT?Santiago recalled telling the World Bank in 2014 that the BRT would fail, attributing 50 percent of the issue to implementation and the other 50 percent to technical aspects.Santiago said CBRT could not be an exclusive route if it passes on Escario St., given the narrowness of the main thoroughfare. He emphasized that the plan was for Osmeña Blvd., where it can become an exclusive route due to the wider lane.“I don’t see how you can make it exclusive, that section to go to Cebu IT Park. Of course, when I look at Mango Ave. it’s wider, maybe it can be exclusive,” Santiago said.Meanwhile, Nigel Paul Villarete, an engineer and an urban planner and one of the first supporters of BRT as Cebu City’s base urban transportation system since 2008, said that “everything went wrong.” However, he said he still supports the CBRT project as a mode of mass transportation.“So many things have gone wrong, so many things have gone astray and it’s very difficult for me to look back and say what’s that thing that is the (hardest) the most? It is cumulative. It’s so hard to correct now. But it is still a good project. Let’s hope for this first line. I am also hoping for the Bulacao to Ayala,” he added. CBRT’s first package covers a distance of 2.38 kilometers from the Cebu South Bus Terminal along N. Bacalso Ave. to the front of the Capitol building along Osmeña Blvd. Package 2 of the CBRT involves the south trunk; from the South Road Properties to Barangay Mambaling via N. Bacalso Ave., while Package 3 refers to the CBRT’s north trunk: from Capitol to North Escario to Gorordo Ave. to Archbishop Reyes Ave. to Cebu IT Park.Meanwhile, Santiago sees the BRT project in conflict with the current implementation of the PUV (public utility vehicle) modernization since the same franchises were given to operators along the same route.Three optionsSantiago said there could be three options for the CBRT project to move forward — to continue (building it) unhampered, change its management or terminate it.“We have three choices for BRT: continue business as usual, let it continue unhampered. You will probably get a product in 2028, if the DOTr will be as good as it should be. But that would be a poor probability of happening based on the record for the past 10 years, it has not shown a competent project team,” Santiago said.He said the political grumbling in Cebu led to the City considering Solomonic solutions, with two options.He said the first option could be the proposal of Councilor James Anthony Cuenco, chairman of the transportation committee, to make the CBRT Package 1 a pilot project before proceeding to the other two packages.“And if you do that, there is a 90 percent probability that it should be terminated because there will be traffic in that short section,” he said.The second option, on the other hand, which is a longer section, is to let the whole line be operational, which he said, can be done in six months.“Package 1 takes almost two years, and then Packages 2 and 3 are longer. They say it will be finished in 2027, but if you consider the experience of Package 1, it will probably take you to 2030,” Santiago said.But what will happen to the center islands? Santiago said he advocated for solutions like underpasses to improve pedestrian crossings in the BRT project, emphasizing their cost-effectiveness and convenience. However, he criticized the 15-minute overhead crosswalks as punitive, especially for senior citizens. Santiago insisted on accessibility for BRT stations, suggesting escalators or underpasses; however, he condemned the removal of skywalks without replacements, warning of worsened traffic conditions. He questioned the safety measures for buses and recalled the DPWH’s clearance of skywalks higher than bus heights during construction. / AML Membership Card Benefits at Philippine Casinos . It’s always a good idea to take your time and make sure you’ve found the best online casino in the Philippines on the online gambling market that can give you what you want.

Online Casino in the Philippines Selection Criteria

THE International Criminal Court (ICC) has “directly communicated” with over 50 active and former police officials in relation to its investigation on the alleged crime against humanity, or murder in the country during the drug war of former President Rodrigo Duterte.This was bared by former senator Antonio Trillanes IV, who said in a social media post Wednesday, April 24, 2024: “Based on highly credible information, the ICC investigators have already directly communicated with more than 50 active and former PNP officials regarding their being implicated in the crimes against humanity case of Rodrigo Duterte at the ICC.”“This means that if they do not immediately signify their intention to cooperate with the investigators, their status would be elevated to being suspects and, therefore, would result in travel restrictions initially and eventually arrest via Interpol,” he added.In response, Philippine National Police (PNP) chief of the Public Information Office (PIO) Colonel Jean Fajardo maintained that while they respect the ongoing investigation of the ICC, they stand by the position of the National Government.“We have working judicial system. Meron tayong mga korte na pupuwede pong duminig kung meron man pong mga pag-aabuso at mga ireguralidad sa hanay ng PNP at napatunayan natin dahil may mga pulis tayo na nakasuhan, nakulong at naconvict. So yun ang gagawin ng PNP, magpapasakop sa hurisdiksyon ng Pilipinas,” she said.(We have a working judicial system. We have courts that can hear if there are any abuses and irregularities in the ranks of the PNP and we have proven it because we have police officers who have been charged, imprisoned and convicted. So that's what the PNP will do, submit to the jurisdiction of the Philippines.)Trillanes was among the personalities who sought for the intervention of the ICC into the bloody drug war of Duterte back in 2017.He earlier said that the ICC have gathered enough evidence against Duterte and an arrest warrant against him may be out “very very soon.”President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. earlier maintained that the Philippines will not cooperate in the ongoing ICC probe into Duterte’s drug war, as the ICC has no jurisdiction over the country.Marcos said he considered the ICC as a threat to the country’s sovereignty.He said the Philippines will not recognize any arrest warrant that may be issued by the ICC."We don't recognize the warrant that they will send to us...That's a no…We are well within international law when we take the position of not recognizing the jurisdiction of ICC in the Philippines," said Marcos.In July 2023, the ICC appeals chamber has granted a request seeking the resumption of investigation on alleged crime against humanity or murder in the Philippines related to the controversial drug war of Duterte from November 1, 2011 to March 16, 2019.Duterte was the mayor of Davao City from 2011 before he was elected as the president of the Republic in 2016.The former President ordered the withdrawal of the Philippine’s membership to the Rome Statute, which established the ICC, in March 2019.Also named as principal respondent of the case along with Duterte was former chief of the PNP now Senator Ronald “Bato” dela Rosa.Dela Rosa served as the chief implementer of the drug war, which resulted in the death of over 6,000 alleged drug personalities.Several policemen were facing charges before the Department of Justice over alleged irregularities in the conduct of anti-illegal drugs operations under the former administration, including the alleged planting of evidence, among others. (TPM/SunStar Philippines) licensed online casinos THE Central Visayas Regional Police Office has ordered an investigation on possible criminal liability of individuals involved in the controversial online interview of Brigada News FM with a minor rape victim from Dumanjug, Cebu.In a statement, the Police Regional Office 7 clarified that the viral interview of the minor victim by Brigada News FM was conducted within the premises of their residence and not in the Dumanjug police station and also without the consent or knowledge of the police.It said the sexual abuse allegedly happened on March 8, 2024 and was reported to the police station on March 10, 2024. The police interviewed the victim on March 11, 2024 in the police station in the presence of the Municipal Social Worker and Development Officer (MSWDO), her mother and aunt, and the school teacher of the minor.It maintained that the interview was done in accord with the procedures in handling child victims, ensuring confidentiality of the proceedings.However, it said the minor’s aunt, without the knowledge and consent of the police officer and MSWDO, discreetly took a video during the interview and forwarded it to another person who posted it on social media. The video was later on deleted.In a separate statement, the Dumanjug Municipal Police Station (MPS) noted that the victim’s mother called up a media personality, whom she personally knew, to report the incident and ask for advice prior to reporting to the police station.On March 13, Juril Patiño, a lawyer, and Dennes Tabar, anchors of Brigada News FM Cebu, conducted a live on-air interview of the victim. It was facilitated by their field reporter, Jonalyn Jumabis.During the interview, the broadcasters asked the minor victim to recount the details of the abuse. “After the interview, the minor victim and her mother reported back to Dumanjug MPS to turn over the medical/psychological examination result and to further review the prepared documents for the filing of formal criminal complaints against the suspect,” the Dumanjug MPS said.“Upon knowing that the victim’s mother entertained a radio interview about the incident, the WCPD investigator again reminded the former to protect the confidential nature of the case and to refrain from entertaining anymore media interviews,” it added.The Dumanjug MPS recommended to the higher headquarters the filing of appropriate complaints, if evidence warrants, to the persons involved in the posting of the video and the conduct of interview in accordance with the Best Interest of the Child under Republic Act 7610. (TPM/SunStar Philippines)

The Top Slots Available in the Philippines

Much like the rest of the world, the flash and blur of the slots has made them Membership Card Benefits at Philippine Casinos for players who deposit with credit and debit cards from the Philippines. Recognized by international gambling laws, online slots can be found in the best casino in the Philippines. A main reason is that they are incredibly simple to play – all you need to do is adjust the settings for how much you wish to bet per spin, then watch the reels fly. The Best TALA888 GCash Filipinas for Real Money ▷ Poker Online Philippines ▷ Fishing Game Play at the Top Real Money Casino, Win Real Money. The favorites, based on Filipino trends, are highlighted here:

Gambling in the Philippines 2023 – the Latest Trends

THE International Criminal Court (ICC) has “directly communicated” with over 50 active and former police officials in relation to its investigation on the alleged crime against humanity, or murder in the country during the drug war of former President Rodrigo Duterte.This was bared by former senator Antonio Trillanes IV, who said in a social media post Wednesday, April 24, 2024: “Based on highly credible information, the ICC investigators have already directly communicated with more than 50 active and former PNP officials regarding their being implicated in the crimes against humanity case of Rodrigo Duterte at the ICC.”“This means that if they do not immediately signify their intention to cooperate with the investigators, their status would be elevated to being suspects and, therefore, would result in travel restrictions initially and eventually arrest via Interpol,” he added.In response, Philippine National Police (PNP) chief of the Public Information Office (PIO) Colonel Jean Fajardo maintained that while they respect the ongoing investigation of the ICC, they stand by the position of the National Government.“We have working judicial system. Meron tayong mga korte na pupuwede pong duminig kung meron man pong mga pag-aabuso at mga ireguralidad sa hanay ng PNP at napatunayan natin dahil may mga pulis tayo na nakasuhan, nakulong at naconvict. So yun ang gagawin ng PNP, magpapasakop sa hurisdiksyon ng Pilipinas,” she said.(We have a working judicial system. We have courts that can hear if there are any abuses and irregularities in the ranks of the PNP and we have proven it because we have police officers who have been charged, imprisoned and convicted. So that's what the PNP will do, submit to the jurisdiction of the Philippines.)Trillanes was among the personalities who sought for the intervention of the ICC into the bloody drug war of Duterte back in 2017.He earlier said that the ICC have gathered enough evidence against Duterte and an arrest warrant against him may be out “very very soon.”President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. earlier maintained that the Philippines will not cooperate in the ongoing ICC probe into Duterte’s drug war, as the ICC has no jurisdiction over the country.Marcos said he considered the ICC as a threat to the country’s sovereignty.He said the Philippines will not recognize any arrest warrant that may be issued by the ICC."We don't recognize the warrant that they will send to us...That's a no…We are well within international law when we take the position of not recognizing the jurisdiction of ICC in the Philippines," said Marcos.In July 2023, the ICC appeals chamber has granted a request seeking the resumption of investigation on alleged crime against humanity or murder in the Philippines related to the controversial drug war of Duterte from November 1, 2011 to March 16, 2019.Duterte was the mayor of Davao City from 2011 before he was elected as the president of the Republic in 2016.The former President ordered the withdrawal of the Philippine’s membership to the Rome Statute, which established the ICC, in March 2019.Also named as principal respondent of the case along with Duterte was former chief of the PNP now Senator Ronald “Bato” dela Rosa.Dela Rosa served as the chief implementer of the drug war, which resulted in the death of over 6,000 alleged drug personalities.Several policemen were facing charges before the Department of Justice over alleged irregularities in the conduct of anti-illegal drugs operations under the former administration, including the alleged planting of evidence, among others. (TPM/SunStar Philippines) Where can I watch Champions League Philippines 2022?

Some of the most important trends revolve around the changes to the legalisation of online gambling for offshore operators, with President Rodrigo Duterte cracking down on illegal operations in recent years. Otherwise, we’ve identified that the growth in the land-based gambling industry has resulted in job creation for locals, with more than half of all employees in the entertainment sector being employed for gambling and betting activities.

Filipino Player Frequently Asked Questions

There can be a lot of contradictory information and biased reports out there on the internet that can conduse the PH online casino user. We find that our readers often have a lot of questions that need resolving, so we dedicated this section to provide more clarity on the topic of online casino in the Philippines.

1 Which is the best online casino in the Philippines?

The recommended picks include a carefully selected and researched list of fantastic venues. All best Filipino casinos host a slew of great games from various providers and each one stands out with Where can I watch Champions League Philippines 2022? . Besides, the PH online casinos are safe, regulated, and trustworthy, above all else.

2 Are PH online casinos legal?

Yes, Filipinos should know PH online casinos are legal if hosted by offshore operators. We recommend you stick to Membership Card Benefits at Philippine Casinos , as these are legally operating in the country and therefore hold a little risk of being shut down. Avoid shady businesses without official stamps of approval and regular auditing checks.

3 Which are the safest online casinos in the Philippines?

If you stick to licensed and regulated operators, you will be in the hands of safe Filipino casino sites. Those have the latest security and encryption technologies in place to protect their users. Gambling can be addictive, so stay safe from its dangers by setting and sticking to a budget. Top Grossing Casino Apps .

4 Which is the best online casino in the Philippines for slots?

Filipinos should be delighted to learn that the slots sites in the Philippines are jam-packed with incredibly enticing games like Gonzo's Quest, , Big Bad Wolf, Jack Hammer 2, and more. The said slot machines are provided by TALA888 GCash Filipinas with the necessary certification and experience.

5 Which PH online casinos have the best payouts?

The TALA888 GCash Filipinas that are housed by the operator. As each title boasts individual RTP value, the best payout PH casino sites will be those with the highest average across its coming catalog. Information regarding all RTP rates is published on every reputable operator's website.

6 What online casinos in the Philippines offer fast withdrawals?

The speed of the withdrawals depends on the PH online casino payment methods. Across the board, TALA888 GCash Filipinas, with the transaction being finalized in less than a day. Bank transfers take the longest, stretching up to seven business days, due to additional processing and verification checks.

7 Which casino online in the Philippines has the best bonus offer?

Promotions are an integral part of every operator's arsenal to attract and maintain interest. The best Filipino casino site bonuses come in various forms and terms, and which is the most suitable depends on PH players' personal strategies and expectations. Usually, the recommended ones Ang bagong pagpipilian mo para sa online gameplay! Madaling manalo ng malaki! Sali na!.

8 Which online casino in the Philippines offers the most games?

Every top pick out of all online casinos has impressed with its extensive gaming catalogue. It contains representatives of most gambling products that players have grown accustomed to seeing. The numbers Membership Card Benefits at Philippine Casinos , all housed under one single gambling roof. Regardless of your choice, each venue will exceed expectations quantity-wise.

9 Do all online casinos in the Philippines take PayPal?

PayPal is one of the leading e-wallets Where can I watch Champions League Philippines 2022? online. It is always associated with legitimate platforms and can be used to charge up your mobile PH casino account while on the go, as well. Not all casinos accept it, but the recommended ones do and Filipinos can freely use it.

10 Do all PH online casinos offer secure deposits and withdrawals?

Similarly to the land-based casinos in the Philippines, the licensed digital gambling platforms also ensure that all monetary transactions coming in and out of players' accounts are extremely secured. This is ensured by the TALA888 GCash Filipinas that back up and protect each deposit and withdrawal.

Conclusion – Find Trusted Online Casino Sites for Filipino Players

There are a lot of safe and reputable online casinos for players from the Philippines to enjoy, though sorting through them can be time-consuming. To make the task simple, our experts put together a list of the certified online casinos in the Philippines that have been tested and proven to offer satisfactory experiences. Here, you can take advantage of Membership Card Benefits at Philippine Casinos and plentiful payment options in a completely legal setting.

We hope that, by now, you feel safe in the knowledge that there are trustable Filipino online casinos to choose from. Whether you choose to play at the sites featured here or go in search of operators on your own, remember that every Ang bagong pagpipilian mo para sa online gameplay! Madaling manalo ng malaki! Sali na!.

List of All Filipino Casinos

If, after all the information included on this page, you feel you need a quick refresher on the available casino sites – look no further! The table below will show you Where can I watch Champions League Philippines 2022? , along with their welcome bonuses for this year and a direct link to the offer. Philippines’s TALA888 GCash Filipinas Sites